Securing the Cyber Infrastructure
On May 29th, the President of the United States, Barack Obama,
announced the creation of a new White House office to be led by a Cybersecurity Coordinator. The President began his speech by acknowledging the significance of virtual space.
President Obama:
"It's long been said that the revolutions in communications and information technology have given birth to a virtual world. But make no mistake: This world — cyberspace — is a world that we depend on every single day. It's our hardware and our software, our desktops and laptops and cell phones and Blackberries that have become woven into every aspect of our lives."
"So cyberspace is real. And so are the risks that come with it."
Cyberspace is indeed real. Corporate information, personal data, network resources, and virtual commodities have been under constant attack for years. The law is only just beginning to catch up with the criminals and the reality of cyberspace. Most governments are still catching up to the reality of what needs to be protected.
President Obama also discussed the costs involved with eCrime:
"According to one survey, in the past two years alone cyber crime has cost Americans more than $8 billion."
"[W]e've had to learn a whole new vocabulary just to stay ahead of the cyber criminals who would do us harm — spyware and malware and spoofing and phishing and botnets. Millions of Americans have been victimized, their privacy violated, their identities stolen, their lives upended, and their wallets emptied. According to one survey, in the past two years alone cyber crime has cost Americans more than $8 billion."
Eight billion dollars is only a faction of the global costs. While it is impressive that President Obama knows terms such as "malware and spoofing" it remains to be seen if the United States government is "ahead of the cyber criminals". In the constant battle to protect consumer's computers, just keeping up with newly emerging threats is a daily challenge.
On May 29th the Pentagon (United States Department of Defense) submitted their cyber defense plan to the White House. On June 23rd, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, announced the creation of Cybercom. The new organization will be to coordinate the day-to-day operation of military and Pentagon computer networks.
F-Secure Chief Research Officer Mikko Hyppönen contributed the following to the New York Times on the 29th:
"The creation of a White House office for cyberdefense is a step in the right direction. Serious cyberthreats definitely exist — I see evidence of global eCrime daily. Attack technologies are growing in complexity and strength, and civilian government efforts will definitely need to be prepared for an unauthorized breach. Maybe people shouldn’t be so dependent on Internet technologies, but the fact is that they are.
In his remarks today, President Obama emphasized the global nature of the Internet and the security threats involved. This means that protecting the Internet cannot be done without international cooperation. A White House office will also have to address some important political and military questions. For example, it's typical that online attacks are rerouted through various countries to make it harder to locate the attacker's origin. So it will be important to work with other countries in combating these attacks. Moreover, because laws differ from country to country, cooperative enforcement of laws will be crucial.
Cyberwarfare will certainly be asymmetrical warfare. The enemy uses compromised computers belonging to consumers for their dirty work. As a result, the United States needs to think carefully about whether it is willing and committed to counterattack malicious proxies inside the U.S. or inside allied nations. If an attacker launches a wide attack through thousands of infected home computers in Asia and Europe, the U.S. will need to think carefully about how it will protect itself and what attempts to deal with this situation are justified.
There are no easy answers. But the good news in all of this is that President Obama has now clearly and convincingly brought the importance of this matter into the spotlight. It’s about time."
This new effort to secure America's cyber infrastructure, if successful, could finally produce the global organization and cooperation needed to curb the growth of eCrime and other emerging cyber threats. It will be a daunting challenge to undertake.
New York Times:
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/29/a-plan-of-attack-in-cyberspace/
Obama's speech:
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00001693.html
Green Dam Youth Escort
China has mandated that all computers sold in China, including imports, will need to be pre-installed with a software application called "Green Dam Youth Escort". The requirement takes effect on July 1, 2009. The software's intended purpose is to filter pornographic or violent material. Green Dam is designed for Microsoft Windows.
Response to Green Dam has been diverse. Privacy advocates state that Green Dam will act as spyware allowing for the monitoring of millions of Chinese computers.
China has defended Green Dam against these claims stating that it is nothing more than filtering software.
In addition to censorship and monitoring concerns, there are claims that Green Dam infringes on copyrights belonging to Solid Oak Software Inc.
The Wall Street Journal has reported that Solid Oak would file injunctions on U.S. manufacturers to stop them shipping machines with Green Dam.
On June 11th, researchers from the University of Michigan published a report called "
Analysis of the Green Dam Censorware System". The report demonstrated various security vulnerabilities in Green Dam Youth Escort that could allow "malicious sites to steal private data, send spam, or enlist the computer in a botnet". At least one of the reported vulnerabilities was patched on June 13th.
The security implications of millions of computers running Green Dam cannot be ignored. Vulnerabilities in Green Dam could suddenly introduce a "low hanging fruit" to be exploited on July 1st.
University of Michigan:
http://www.cse.umich.edu/~jhalderm/pub/gd/
Internet Storm Center:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6571&rss
June's Iranian Presidential Election
The disputed Iranian presidential election of June 12, 2009 has led to large political protests and a wave of social networking media use. Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other sites are being heavily utilized to distribute information and to circumvent government censorship. Facebook now offers a Persian language interface. Google Translate launched a "Persian ALPHA" tool. Twitter.com has been used to such an extent that the site was asked by the United States State Department to delay any network maintenance that might take the site offline.
This use of social media sites is a favorable development. Information wants to be free. On the other side of technology, there are also calls for Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks and targeted hacks against Iranian government servers.
More information from The World Tech Podcast:
http://64.71.145.108/pod/tech/WTPpodcast247.mp3
Some of these attacks are much like the Estonian DDoS attacks of two years ago. Those that could not take part in physical protests turned to cyberspace in order to take action. In Iran's case, calls to DDoS government servers could create collateral damage to the networks being used by protestors. As cyberspace continues to integrate itself with our daily real world activities, we will see more political cyber attacks in the future. These attacks will not be carried out by military forces but rather by self-organized groups.
The Future
Technology does not discriminate between just and unjust causes. Hopefully the move to create a unified defense of the American cyber infrastructure will help generate the tools and organizations to maintain a global virtual world were information can flow freely and yet people will be defended against cyber attacks. As President Obama stated, cyberspace has become "woven into every aspect of our lives." It must be protected.